usaid contracts vs cooperative agreements

#Usaid Contracts Vs Cooperative Agreements Full Range Of

Period of performace 3 years or less. Incorporate revised contract clauses and assistance provisions previously.USAID makes payment at the achievement of pre-determined milestones. Newsroom: News, Blogs, Podcasts, VideosUSAID Direct Contracting, ADS 303 Grants and Cooperative Agreements to Non-. The method selected will influence the number of applications received and The AO makes the determination of which NOFO to use based on the intent and characteristics of the result(s) USAID is seeking. There are two types of notices of funding opportunity (NOFO) available to USAID Agreement Officers: Requests for Applications (RFA) and Annual Program Statements (APS).

Usaid Contracts Vs Cooperative Agreements Full Range Of

Results-Based Financing Indicator Compendium Each action completed on a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement takes USAID one step closer to reaching its ambitious mission as an Agency.As a Contract Specialist your duties will include: Performing a full range of complex procurement activities for contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements. Health Information Systems Strengthening Resource CenterEvery day in more than 80 countries around the world, USAID’s more than 600 A&A professionals are helping to design, execute, and manage the partnerships that support the Agency in achieving its mission. USAID provides a transfer of anything of value to support the recipient’s program.Outreach & Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreements Increase access and participation of socially disadvantaged applicants in FSA programs and services. No dollar amout limit for USAID prime FAA awards. USAID will not be substantially involved.

History and ResultsThe project created tools and approaches for rigorous evaluations, developed the expertise of institutions and individuals to strengthen HIS, shared information, and expanded the evidence base so countries can make better decisions and sustain good health outcomes over time. Our work built in-country capacity and accountability for moving toward the key global priorities to combat HIV/AIDS and prevent child and maternal deaths. MEASURE Evaluation enabled countries to improve lives by strengthening their capacity to generate and use high-quality health information to make evidence-informed, strategic decisions at local, subregional, and national levels.MEASURE Evaluation worked in this arena for more than 20 years. Community-Based Indicators for HIV ProgramsThe MEASURE Evaluation project, funded by the United States Agency for International Development, had a mandate to strengthen health information systems (HIS) in low-resource settings.

Read about our team.MEASURE Evaluation was UNC’s largest single research award and a major contributor to the university’s thought leadership on global health, health systems, health informatics, data quality and data visualization, rigorous evaluation of health programs, and systems thinking on global health. The TeamMEASURE Evaluation was led by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), with a consortium comprising five health system expert organizations: ICF International, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for Health, Palladium, and Tulane University. You can also read about MEASURE Evaluation’s history and our Learning Agenda, which describes how we worked to achieve these results. Increased capacity for rigorous evaluationTo learn more, see the project’s brochure, the Health Information System Strengthening Resource Center, a video presentation by the project’s director, and an overview of the project in Spanish. Methods, tools, and approaches improved and applied to address health information challenges and gaps Improved country-level capacity to manage health information systems

Read more about project capabilities, expertise, and services in evaluation, gender, health informatics, geographic information systems, and other aspects of HIS strengthening. ServicesMEASURE Evaluation was committed to helping USAID missions deliver results for their partners and those they serve. The 'leader' is the initial award to the consortium and the 'associates' are additional awards made by USAID missions and bureaus for work in Kenya, Tanzania, and South Africa.